This page was linked to an email list intervention.
The following message was posted to news@dnafoundation.com
eMailList
|
|
The excerpt mentioned in the message follows, as well as the comments
|
To: wtheaux@club-internet.fr <wtheaux@club-internet.fr> Date: samedi 22 mai 1999 01:56 Subject: Moses/Akhnaten
I'm pretty much convinced that Moses and Akhnaten were one and the same person. Last year I read a book, Bloodline of the Holy Grail...the hidden lineage of Jesus revealed, by Laurence Gardner. Within those pages was a short testimony to that fact. Here is the excerpt:
-end of excerpt. Is there any in-depth literature out there that I might obtain on this topic. When will all of the lies be finally put to rest and the plain Truth be accepted for just what it is...the Truth.
|
At the end of the above excerpt, this generous reader wonders
when the lies will end. Perhaps does it end with Gardner, or with Osman,
perhaps will Truth be, always available, simple and plain.
In akhnaton.net project, the nature of Truth is seen
as political fact. Its history is Biology.
Here follow some comments about the political
aspect.
1) The conditions at birth of Oedipus match exactly Gardner-Osman description of Akhnaton's. <back to text>
2) There is something however curious when the tale of
"the child downstream in a reed basket" is not
refered to the similar one of Sargon's.
Sargon was one of the early founders of the Babylonian Empire. His stella
has been revealed by archeology, where he wrote that his mother had laid
him downstream in a reed basket etc...It is quite obvious that Moses'
birth story echoes Sargon's. Gardner is not obliged to mention the Sargon
anteriority, for he is not obliged to attribute it to Akhnaton. Why does
he lay this tale there?
There are really no evidence for Tiye putting his sonn in a reed basket.
Why should Garner use this story for such a childish feeling?
<back to text>
3) In the same way, he describes the young Akhnaton with a genuine impusle against the Egyptian naive religion. But it is again a childish description of the political decisions of the leader of the greatest empire in the ancient time. Akhnaton had been intesively educated and his decisions were calculated. Moreover he could not act without a group of politicians which were thinking about the political ways to hold together the various cultures of people who inhabited the Egyptian territory. Even to think that Akhnaton was a dreamer - as still some Egyptologists do - is, indeed, a dream. <back to text>
4) There is simply no evidence that Nefertiti was the daughter of Sitamun. <back to text>
On this last
comment, I try to preserve my own bet - which is that Nefertiti was from
the Aegean Lands. There are no evidence either. But this is participating
in an attempt for understanding Akhnaton's behavior as one of a rationalist
and simple practical man looking for unifying the East Mediterranean.
When Mickael Gorbatchev attempted to change the government of his country,
it was not just because he could not accept the mentality of the party any
more, as a genius divine child would do. Beside his honorable demonstration
for objectivity, Gardner compromises with a supposed infantilism of his readers.
About the biological aspect, the initial
chapter of the page
![]()
shows how Christian issues and where Christinatiy are provoked.
It implies questions and positions about the Science of genetics
that this civilization has developed
END OF THE PAGE
FOOT PAGE
|
EXCHANGE IDEAS, IMPROVE KNOWLEDGE
Registration to a
Mailing
List -
free
subscription
Membership access
area -
one
time $15 fee All transactions are secured
|
|||||||||||||
© William Theaux 1949-1999