SOCIOGENETICA PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCT |
This node page in
akhnatonEbook was initially oriented toward the DNAgroup function. |
The starting point of this enunciation finds a notion which has been suggested by Daniel Kolos in the amarna/akhnaton egroups series; on Tue, 04 Jul 2000 15:24:03 -0400, he defines a "spherical thinking" and writes " I like to call spherical thinking where the balance is not merely a see-saw between two extremes, but an exercise in looking a topic from as many points of view as is humanly possible ".
Such see-saw can be identified with the fluctuation between two poles in Freud's Model of the Collective Psychology.
ego see-saw between objects and Ideal | ||
This diagram represents the 'ego' in a crowd - oscillating between two identification poles, being the 'objects' that we are or that we enliven on the left, and the Ideal on the right that we share as community members : Pic.10 (click on pic. to go to the Development of Social Reality page) |
||
< < < objects |
Ideal > > > |
Pic.10 shows Freud's graph for of a collectivity of five people. In the case of a mass, the two lines of attraction can extend indefinitely as two vertical parallel rails (objects on the left, Ideal on the right, pic.10) - this being analogous with the chromosomes' relationship in a pair, as I'll explain below. For the moment we note that the graph is describing a primitive psychology, according to the apparent behavior of human collectivities. But as far as fascism, known to be based on the credence that masses have a soul (see G.Lebon's sociology early 20th century), has proven a failure, Freud's social platform model will look for an additional degree before representing an Animated or Awakened Psyche (aka Soul).
Further in his text, DK indicates a rule that he attributes in the spherical thinking, being a mode of " communicating through the Intelligence of the Heart ". This recipe finds an appropriate illustration again in the Optical Model, the way I have depicted it in 1997 (click on pic.20) for an ardent practitioner of learning 'by heart', Muslim version:
Here is this picture where the heart is indicated in place of the vase - that is where the initial Model ( ) locates the somatic body and body parts - in the elliptical envelop that represents the nervous system.
pic.20 (click on pic to visit other text where inserted)
This Optical Model by Lacan is the same and can be superimposed with Freud's Model of the Crowd; it indicates the higher degree of thinking, with an individual who is merged in this crowd. This added virtue builds up upon a logical link (the famous Transference) which transfers the charge of value from the Ideal toward an object. It can manifest in History with an oppressor (on the right) and a victim (on the left) or with more peaceful conjunctions. For instance here pic.20, physical objects, heart and blood flux, are in front of their 'image' beyond the mirror, that is the metaphor of heart as flowers with love (thus i'(a) representing a ideal loving ego). On both sides of the real 'ego' - which is the oscillating grain of mirror in pic.10 - these two categories, object and Ideal, are thus analyzed in a way that they reveal their relationship (see below) through the mechanic of this Optical phase that represents a variation of Freud's Model.
At this point it seems the Psychoanalysis matches indeed
DK's proposal, with the description of the basis of a primitive thought (see-saw)
and its progress where the metaphor of the heart applies, since he also writes : " Intelligence
of the Heart, or, rather, the Mediation of the Heart ". This
precision is even more confirmative since in the Psychoanalytical models, it is
typically a mediation role that occurs in the place where pic.20 shows a
heart (see below the role of the secondary interface).
Just a doubt yet subsists with the expression of spherical
thinking. And as it is often see in great concords such single detail may open
to a radical difference between DK and Psychoanalysis.
As it is frequent in such situation, it is with an amusing
observation that the thorny detail begins to stick out. For looking at these schemas
above, one would rather evoke an elliptical rather that spherical thinking.
Is it a accidental coincidence, or the true call for a pun, since Psychoanalysis
indicates an Unconscious that is in some ways a grammatical ellipse -
meanwhile in our times that can be compared with the Renaissance, comes the
memory of the Ptolemean view of the world, in opposition before the Copernician
one. We know that the issue was eventually
brought to a close in passing from a spherical model to the elliptical
representation of the motions in the sky.
It is from this point of view that I'll try to make explicit what is at the heart of Psychoanalysis, and how it motivates a knowledge about the role of Code in the collective destiny.
In order to investigate what is Psychoanalysis, information may be taken from its claim about sexuality. Though it has made its bad reputation, sexuality has been honestly questioned by Psychoanalysis. Beyond Freud and Jung dispute (about libido), Lacan's deny (about sexual ratio) etc.. we see Psychoanalysis addressing the civilization and industry phase when sexuality passes under control of biology. With control over hormones, genes and insemination, it is as if sexuality was suddenly deprived from all its alibis - and with an appropriate analysis, this loss reveals an enlightenment instead: sexuality still stands in its pure form, as a logic that bases the foundation of Time. Admittedly it still manifests through relations as ego-&-Artificial Intelligence, individual-&-ecosystem - but at its core it stands with no other expression than the relationship between the present and Time. In other words, memory is sexuality par excellence.
Hence we are drawn to draw the relationship of a being with his
or her past, and the text below explains by itself how to chose the simplest way to
illustrate such fundamental. The same way we used the word 'soul' in order to
express what a genome is, we used 'sex' in order to express what is a spire of
signification:
pic.30 ('sexion')
This discourse surrounding and meaning itself, and looking like the
letter PHI - phallus, - is not an
'intercourse' in the sense of this word (intercourse) before the industry of Code that currently sets a living being
for an intra relationship,
with him or her self within, like an whole ecosystem acts upon itself. Let us notice also that this is not
either the icon of the snake
that eats its own tail - there is an opening in this discourse that crosses
itself (and constitutes a metaphor) and in the moment it takes to run such
circuits, a creation can be set. Let us make it therefore as the contemporary
representation of sexuality - restoring the integrity of the person by closing
the loop:
pic.40 (click on pic and visit Transference and Political Change)
There we have a complete graph.. and the moment for the reader as well for questioning the reason that legitimates it form rather than any other one. No other reason than coming back to the heart of Psychoanalysis, is the answer, with a good illustration for what can be explained:
The double spire (pic.40)
holds two centers - it is thus an alternate way to represent what can be an
elliptic thinking. When I presented first the above paragraphs alone, a reader
wrote:
<< The image of the ellipse & Dr
Theaux' comments on elliptical thinking come to mind, and what happens when, in
an elliptical basin filled with water, one of the foci of the ellipse is
disturbed by a falling drop: the other focus responds in inverted fashion.
>>
I could support this observation as: << I happened to write
on a paper towel, a few years ago, during a conversation, what kind of 'psychic'
order can be drawn beside or in comparison with a 'cosmic' order, from
Ptolemy to Copernicus. We know that Copernicus was still 'Ptolemean' in that he
believed that the planets were following a regular spherical motion. And he did
not put the Sun exactly at the center of his system. Actually he thought that
the Sun was 'close' to the center - somewhat like Freud saying later that Moses
was 'close' to Akhnaton. In the case of the cosmos, we already know that it is
after Copernicus that a twist happens, a knot and a catastrophe -
everything, each point of view change when moving from a Matter-Earth at the
center, to an orbiting one. It is a very long analysis, to go through all the
meanders. Direct and simple, I prefer to post the graph for the group.. >>
The illustration of our Collective Psychology as a cosmic ellipse (click the graph) gravitating around Oedipus & Moses foci, is completed with the double-spire alternate illustration that shows how these two foci can generate two discourses - two spires - and how they organize their crossing , (pic.30) : in pic.40 this 'sexion' separates two portions, or phases, in the total course (pic.40, 2 & 3) while each of these states come from and go to a unique and similar mode (pic.40, 1). Possibly a reader will find all this 'abstract' and 'intellectual' - but s/he must be warned against hes possible mistake; for s/he may be misled with a prejudice about physical intercourse and may not realize how abstract and intellectual in fact is the sexual relationship between human beings. S/he should be aware that even animal mammals may experience a special 'state of mind' when mating, and orgasm may be a door for special 'intellectualism' in general. Moreover, on the other hand, these ellipse and double-spire schema illustrate very objective and 'real' things, as we shall now see. It is therefore a good possibility that we are now aiming toward the very physical experience of what sexuality deserves to be.
I am only sorry with the animated pic below, that I have made too baroque, overloaded. I hope that my commentary will help to make it useful.
FOUNDATIONS FOR AN INDUSTRY OF THE CODE The Link/Articulation between
Things and Ideas, i.e. objects and symbols or Code and Significand,
Overview of the Code/Object & Significand/Ideal Articulation Linear Thinking:
Logic of the Code/Object & Significand/Ideal Articulation Towards dynamic formula : The picture shows (lower-right corner) the
series passing twice at 1 while
alternatively 2 & 3
. The position 2 has been commented
above. It represents the metaphor when the real heart transferts the
charge that is loaded in 1 as the
symbol of Love.
Still in progress the present page will then describe how the mono 'psychoanalytic' phase defined by Lacan in his Optical Model position 2 is fibered with the Plural Analysis development - as 2 & 3 ; this is thus indicating the two positions that Unefpe defined in 1985 as Plural Psychoanalysis (2) and PLural ANalysis (3). It is ony from that moment that the history of Psychoanalysis shows the interpretation of AMO and the identification of Psychoanalysis as an Ecology - hence completing the Art of Memory and Civilization itself with a 'memory' in a restored and completed identity of the Amarnian Scene.
...
|