In
October NewsLetter, the news is that is is late again. The feed-back
to dnafoundation.com and akhnaton.net continuing to be close to null, a
neurological effects is still visible in the very slow motion of their
production.
Beside
the apathy in the Collective Psychology interactivity, a borderline mentality
which is induced increases in singularity. Thus in turn, the introduction
in my environment is made more difficult. Fortunately a kind of 'firewall'
operates with the tool of money - and my, or Cybek's, feed-back for anomia
can rely on a value criteria which is given by a membership fee. It
is with this arragenement that I exposes the taboo and repressed activity
of our industry.
The
previous NewsLetter already mentioned part of this forbidden knowledge -
and evoked a particuliar censorship, that I shall both complete and
explain hereby. First, the censorship
; I announced that I would oppose it with the
copy of a censored paragraph onto a special page - I was thinking of a page
included in a diary that I was planing to make public. The story of a public
diairy is not new.
When
I began to work with Unefpe/Plural Analysis in 1985, I began also a diary
for several years. It was the beginning of the public computer network which
appears today as one of the major element which will change the planet during
the first decenies of the third millenium. One of the aspect that was already
visible in 1985 was the tremendous effect it is going to manifest in
the domain of privacy.
Since
Artificial Intelligence will penetrate our private life even deeper than
we known it ourself, a reasonable behavior may be to anticipate this threatening
intrusion and open to the public every sector of our existence. This may
be expected to stimulate an attitude - like a vaccine, if I may use this
metaphore - which will dipose us to integrate the complete disapearance of
privacy (it may avoid us to build a fiction of a private life, with pathological
consequencies). At that time, I found an help for this project in the reputation
fo Atonism for being a political experience of open truth and realism. Later
I interupted quite abruptly this diairy and found myself unable to resume
it for several years. Only recently, I could resume this daily set of notes.
Yet the project of publically opening this new series is still awaiting to
be concluded. Actually, I recently drew back from this project - for some
reason which may be related to the shame which results from the anomia.
For
this particuliar or general reason of the unfeed-back, mentioned above,
the little paragraphe which is censored in September NewsLetter is not yet
accessible. It does not prevent it to be presented in a more complete manner
hereby.
A
forbidden knowledge runs currently our political times and psychosocial
consciousness, as it did during the Renaissance and other inquisition periods
in history. I have mentioned part of it, as being the industry of life
maintenance that we see with genetics and in vitro gestation. The second
part is Artificial Intelligence. As the great majority among us wants to
ignore all about genetics, practically all of us do not think about the overall
process which is the logic of Cybernetics. Perhaps Artificial Intelligence
is even more a taboo than Genetics that we consciously repress -
Artificial Intelligence may even be unrecognizable by the ego.
Cybernetics
cover a thrid domain which is chemistery. Its law applies to drugs, hormones
and brain agents.. There is the most popular and visible part of the repression
and the inquisition. With this occasion the principal factor for ecology
and tool for ethics - the function of freedom - is blatantly betrayed by
the governments of the people.
There
is no reasonable Psychoanalysis that would not held as its principle concerne
these three fields of Reproduction, Cybernetics and Drugs - I guess that
there are not many reader who would not agree... that this text is htting
a forbidden knowledge. Then I have not much more to say, once I have made
precise what was the object of Psychanalysis.
Yet,
there is no possibility for eliminating the Word. It is thus - certainly
- possible to find how it manifests over the buzy anomia and its nothingness.
There, I wonder if I may not relate the pain and the delay that strike the
media hereby. This NewsLetter may be saying that Writing - as a scaffold
- has its time to pass when its building is complete. Writting may only resist
against "Reproduction, Cybernetics and Drugs" now.
Cybek is currently working on the production of a video
document, and this may relate to the slowing down that its writen pages shows.
Dr. William THEAUX, NYC 98/09/02 11:52:01 (actually uploaded 98/09/18, slowly catching up against inhibition)