Zenon under Attack (note05)
Zenon under Attack is the title for a
progressive page where a procedure of law is assumed before the
Court of the People.
It it a measure which complies to the New Mentality in which the
Internet takes part - which is in a beginning state when the page
is created in Nov 1999 - and which does not intend to replace the
established tools of law but to enhance them following to the
progress which is brought to civilization by technology. For
instance the Acts and Decisions of the Supreme Court are
considered to be pre-eminent upon the knowledge of the people
which will thus find it satisfactory.
TABLE This page is made of three parts First
part Second
part Third
part |
Mythological background History always serves as an example or a reference with which one can identify what is the present. Because they are remembered, it is by necessity great characters for events which are so brought to us by History; this does not imply that what the characters or the events that they examplify are great. What is examplified is no necessarily amplified - keeping this in mind with humility we have chosen the mythological background of Giordano Bruno. What characterizes Bruno is a) the discourse of the Primal Scene, b) the invitation of transmitting this information in the Capital center of the Empire of his time, c) his agreement and his cohabitation with the initiate, d) the interruption of the initiation when his correspondent goes to court and accuses him of harming, bringing angish and being inhuman. The final step of Bruno's characterization if e) his elimination by the Empire. The situation of WT finds an example there for, a) he bears in his time the discourse of the Primal Scene (NOTE.1); b), c), and d) follow in the same form and order than with Bruno. |
We know that 'mythology' is usually not considered by the application of the law, which applies to factual elements. But in looking closer at this first asusmption, we realize that 'in fact' the law is always based on previous, historical reference. Therefore, what we have called 'Mythological Background' stands as a valid understanding fo the Factual Elements.
Factual Elements The Attack upon Zenon (subnote05) is grounded on the description of a scene in three points a), b), c), as follows:
The Defendant is summoned to answer
|
Comments The Factual Elements are instigaten by a compulsion of repetition: In the supposition of a compulsion of
repetition, we assume that the 'Mythological
Background' is enacted in the 'Factual elements'. In this
process - and reason why it is 'compulsive' - tha actors
are not aware of this determination (technically called
super-determination). However this awareness is made
possible by the use of reason and reflection. It is for
instance understandable that a social structure - as an
Empire, as any institutionalized human group - enacts
certain mechanisms of repression, or inhibition, of
certain memories. When these memories tends to surface,
they are processed through certain mechanisms which
eliminate them (they are admitted in the pre-counscious,
charged with negativity and repressed - we
can say that they are invited, arrested, eliminated); no
matter what is the 'reason' at that level, the mind
always find and/or construct easily any negative alibis -
and the repression usually process smoothly. In periods of change - and when the change is ready, the reason calls for the memory of the Primal Scene. There we can see a conflict between t The choice of the Mythological Background is legitimate and valid: It may be question if the accusation against
Giordano Bruno is justified at all, since the factual
elements of his trial were grounded on religious and
political points. An observator of the accusation against
Zenon may wonder if this can be equated with the ruling
of mariage by laic government in 1999.
|
note05; also titled - or sub-titled - Attack upon Zenon
n1: Note.10 :
Note.m20 | (members Note) The description of the 'primal scene' as it is enounced by the judicial summon to answer is read according to the linguisitics structure which has first been described by Psychoanalysis in dream. This does not mean that the I.A is dreaming, but that s/he represents a collective enunciation structure (as it is legitimate with the Mythological Background to identify and to name an Inquisition Agent, I.A., before its mutation into A.I, Artificial Intelligence). |
Note.m22 | (members Note) There is a second
articulation between points b) and a), that expresses the
mirror/narcissistic logic of the Unconscious. Punching
anyone without provocation and intentionally, is a
definite sign of mental unbalance. Point b) would
therefore make sense in denouncing the uncapability of
the said psychiatrist having already denied its function
by accusing someone of mental unbalance. This would allow a divorce and imply a recommendation for a mental health treatment of the Defendant. |