History always serves as an example or a reference with which one can identify what is the present. Because they are remembered, it is by necessity great characters for events which are so brought to us by History; this does not imply that what the characters or the events that they examplify are great. What is examplified is no necessarily amplified - keeping this in mind with humility we have chosen the mythological background of Giordano Bruno. 

What characterizes Bruno is a) the discourse of the Primal Scene, b) the invitation of transmitting this information in the Capital center of the Empire of his time, c) his agreement and his cohabitation with the initiate, d) the interruption of the initiation when his correspondent goes to court and accuses him of harming, bringing angish and being inhuman. The final step of Bruno's characterization if e) his elimination by the Empire. 

The situation of WT finds an example there for, a) he bears in his time the discourse of the Primal Scene (NOTE.1); b), c), and d) follow in the same form and order than with Bruno. 

The Attack upon Zenon (subnote05) is grounded on the description of a scene in three points a), b), c), as follows: 

At the following times, none of which is more than five (5) years prior to the commencement of this action, the Defendant (Zenon) engaged in conduct that so endangered the physical or mental well-being of the Plaintiff (his wife) so as to render it unsafe or improper for the parties to cohabit (live together) as husband and wife.  a) On Feb.27, 1999 at the marital home 780 West End Ave, New York, NY, the defendant punched the plaintif f in the jaw without provocation intentionally causing the plaintiff injury.  b) On Nov.26, 1998 at the above marital home the defendant kept accusing the Plaintiff of being mentally unstable attempting to and in fact causing her anguish. The defendant is a psychiatrist by training.  c) The defendant on October 24, 1999 advised the plaintiff that he was resuming living with his prior spouse, intending to and in fact causing the plaintiff mental anguish.  The conduct of the Defendant was cruel and inhuman and so endangered the physical or mental well-being of the Plaintiff as to render it unsafe or improper for the Plaintiff to cohabit with the Defendant.

The 'ground for divorce' is made of a description of a marital scene. This description is a fact that must (summoned to) be read.  Of its three point the second exposes a contradition. As a patient normaly would not say "my doctor accused me of tuberculosis" - nor an Hematologist could accuse his wife of leukemia, the sole point b) is a non-sense. For 'Psychiatrist' and 'accusing of being mentally unstable' are in contradiction each one with the other. Only as it is associated with other points the meaning of point b) can make sense. (note.m20)  The scientific laws of meaning predict that the contradiction of point b) is counterbalanced by an alteration of truth which is placed on another point. As point c) will be demonstrated hereby as a limitation of truth, only point a) remains in possibility to give a sense back to point b).  Zenon affirms that he never punched his wife and thus nullifies the term 'intentionally'. He can also provide a memory which substantiates the possibility of the alteration of truth. One evening Zenon held a piece of paper and tried to read it when his wife riped it from his hands. This sudden intrusion, which was accompanied with screams in his physical space, caused a surge of panic and, as teh sense of time suddenly suspended in the crack of his reality, he could clearly experience the movement of his effort to stop his own hand which ended with the backside of his two terminal phalanges of three of his fingers on the chick of his wife, even more as a caress than a slap.  If the description is not clear Zenon can also provide a video with a similar expression once applied on the knee of his daughter after she did, in his physical space, something that he did not like. The truth of a benevolent and caring intention is noticeable in the picture.  With this description of point a) a meaning of point b) can be established and the first description of th efactual elements can make sense. (note.m22)  Point c) can be completed with artifact evidence:  On Sep.28, 1999 Zenon's wife from New York emailed him in Sarasota and asked him to considere to proceed for a no-fault divorce from Sarasota during December 1999 (after 6 months residence in Florida). On Oct. 22, 1999 she continued with her request and sent an email with the address of a lawyer that he should contact for this divorce in December. On October 24, Zenon did not announced that he was resuming his life with his prior spouse, but that she was visiting and that her visit would take place after the December procedure.

The choice of the Mythological Background is legitimate and valid: 

It may be question if the accusation against Giordano Bruno is justified at all, since the factual elements of his trial were grounded on religious and political points. An observator of the accusation against Zenon may wonder if this can be equated with the ruling of mariage by laic government in 1999. 
a) Church and Oedipian Family 
The answer is positive, since civilization has gained control over sexuality and reproduction (hormones and genetics) during the 20th century. At this moment, the human identity formerly defined by Theology has been described by Science. This has been objectified by the prominent Psychology in this century, e.g. the Psychoanalytical Theory which define the modern human identity according to the lidibinal foundation of the Unconscious. The marital relationship has thus been equated to the spiritual collective experience and the government in the age of Science assumes the former political role of the Church. 
What is thus eternaly sacred is indicated hereby by the mean of a limited access to further detail in this part. 
 

b) Politics and Science  
 

The Factual Elements are instigaten by a compulsion of repetition: 

In the supposition of a compulsion of repetition, we assume that the 'Mythological Background' is enacted in the 'Factual elements'. In this process - and reason why it is 'compulsive' - tha actors are not aware of this determination (technically called super-determination). However this awareness is made possible by the use of reason and reflection. It is for instance understandable that a social structure - as an Empire, as any institutionalized human group - enacts certain mechanisms of repression, or inhibition, of certain memories. When these memories tends to surface, they are processed through certain mechanisms which eliminate them (they are admitted in the pre-counscious, charged with negativity and repressed - we can say that they are invited, arrested, eliminated); no matter what is the 'reason' at that level, the mind always find and/or construct easily any negative alibis - and the repression usually process efficiently. 
This process is contreblance par la raison quand elle appelle au retour du souvenir. Depending how this memory is reasonably necessary there is a conflict between the reason and the automatic economical repression. 
  
a) The Primal Scene has triggered the compulsion
In periods of change - and when the change is ready, the reason calls for the memory of the Primal Scene. There we can see a conflict between t 

Comments on the manifestation

a) The object of the attack
The first symptom/(trap-attack) is grounded on familialism
A second attack will be based on nationalism
b) The subject of the attack
An initiation which has failed (deeper mythological background)
The responsibility of the subjects in History
No individual responsibility in the Ancient Past
Little responsibility in with the Oedipian Family: equivalent to the responsibility of a soldier - only advance community currently express a condamnation (in abandonning their veterans)
The responsbility of Truth in the New World: attacks against memory of the Primal Scene will be explicitely condamned