The Unconscious and Christianity

 

Erle's (note) message described a situation of Christianity in the elist of the current fellowship for the revival of Atonism. I wish to add some elements which complete Erle's description and introduce a certain complexity in the identification of Christianity. The Roman Church and Protestant sects that I know both are perpetuating a repression over the chemical Christian Sacrament (which contained initially an ergotic neurochemical) - it seems that a similar repression occurs through the Orthodox and Coptic Churches. But something else appears with all these Churches: like many religions, Christianity is complex and the whole may be different from the linear addition of its sects. Moreover there was the Nestorian Chruch which extended up to Mongolia before it evolved through a revolution into Islam. There cannot be a knowledge and understanding of Christianity after Atonism it all these currents aren't apprehended together.

   In spite of this pledge for looking at the entire Christianity after Atonism, I shall consider only the Roman Church in the page hereby. This is to show how each unit (Significand) in a plural entity incorporate in itself the key for the whole. This essay will describe how Atonism (a in Pic.30) is represented by the Roman Christian subjectivity (S in Pic.30) after its repression as the Unconscious function of Hebraism (A in Pic.30) and the transference from Greece (a' in Pic.30) to Hermopolis Magna (back to a in Pic.30) during the Ptolemaic Dynasties.

   In other words, the Bible A makes the Drive from the Unconscious and Christianity S its Subject, while the latter sees/mirrors itself as the Oedipian representation a' of Hebraism which competes with a , the natural state of ego in Nature : Atonism.

 


   The current essay takes root in several formula and their development which have already been published on the web:

Pic.10 shows the Model of Psychology
(ref. Palo Alto, California, US)

Pic.20 shows how through representation and
repetition, the Psychological 'B/Alter' crosses over
the 'imaginary' relationship (psychological AB,object)

Pic.30 shows the Model of Psychoanalysis
(ref. Lacan, Paris, EU)

Clicking on these pictures will lead to further description and comment. They represent the gradual series of abstract modelisation which progresses from plain Psychology to the Meta-Psychology that is Psychoanalysis.


The picture below shows the dynamics of the development of human consciousness; after a first split (phase 1), the world and its beings compose a structure where the green arrow (phase 9 & 10) illustrates here the Unconscious. If this Lacanian model is correct, it should be applied to history; and the formation of the European Christianity as an unconscious result of the repressed Atonism may be well explained indeed.

Pic.40

 
From a first relationship to nature and one's figure (phase 1) a reflection over one's action (phase 5 to 9) brings a source in the imaginary field of the Unconscious, until it crosses with the transference relationship (the pink arrow phase 10). Insofar the relationship between Athen and Egypt during the Ptolemean period shows this transference, the drive which emanates from this Unconscious will result in sticking out as the Christian subjectivity. This arrow game can be drawn on a map where the Unconscious represents Arabia/Israel, with a drive toward Rome/Europe.

 


 

Two clickable pictures (Pic.50&60) are linked to further explanation. They are currently useful in this page, for indicating on which geographic & time area the model of the Unconscious can explain the emergence of Christianity. The Dynastic Order of ancient Egypt (from the left) was moved (to the right) into the Patronymic Hebrew Law, as in the metapsychologization where the source of orientation (B, Pic.10) moves into the Unconscious source to the Drive.

   Besides, History gives an opportunity to check out a practical application of these models. As I shall suggest below, the series from psycho to meta-psychology can be found through the process of Christianity. I base this theory on two previous studies which are represented with the following pictures:

Pic.50 represents the first Akhnaton-Moses layers

Pic.60 represents the secondary complex (beyond Quades/Mt Hermont)

Clicking on these pictures will lead to further description and comment.

 


 

All necessary elements are now gathered for Pic.70 which represents the emergence of Christianity from the Unconscious & through transference

 
An ecological disaster/desertification at the foundation of Egypt is repressed and/then stored
in the Unconscious - Freud's Bible ! - until the Ptolemaic transference; from which after
the Unconscious emerges as the red arrow, pointing at Rome toward Western Christianity.

 


 

 

I ask my friends to bear with me and my constant draft state of mind

 

Note: in case it is not webavailable, copy of Erle's yahoo message can be found in Zenon's CDrom archive (a complete e-archive compilation which is sold to my enemies $10,000)