A trip in France July-August was my excuse for skipping writing one NewsLetter. Yet, I gave a speech in Paris, in front of my family members. I would like to title it the Discourse at Lutece . I shall try to report it for this September NewsLetter.
The
familial nature of my environment for this professional talk follows the
circumstance of repression that generally surrounds my social activity. Still
today this NewsLetter is read by a very limited number of members, and the
interest that is shown for my work - except for a fair frequentation of the
site akhnaton.net - is closed to zero degree. Nor in Forum, Newsgroup, Maillists,
there is a single echo to my presentations ; no eMail contact, no appointement
and nobody signed up for the Seminar which has been announced bigginning
in September. This social isolation is not new, as I explained to my family
members - in the case of an important, clear and well documented thesis that
I promote, it is even classical.
As
repression usually welcomes any change in the common ignorance, it is as
boring as war, that Collective Psychology preferes, as a compensation for
its reluctance of Truth.
Hopefuly,
one can see advantages in this compelling compulsion of ostracism of knowledge
: it brings out an understanding of the power, and also the limits, of our
Collective Psychology. The power of the social environment
is such that all individual desire for communication and/or information is
absolutely subjected to its dicta. On the other extreme, limits are shown
in that the idealisation process of which it is built, cannot been enlightened.
In other words. Collective Psychology will not release its self-knowledge.
Individuals exist who have been able to overcome this impediment
; yet they are quite few for their deed has no meaning but an utmost taboo
- incest in the case of Oedipus, rape in the case of the modern
hero. They are thus elected for the anomia, described by the
Sociologist E.Durkheim
. Their time is waiting for the slow echo coming
from their silence or their repression ; this atonal reflection coming from
a void is visible today as Technology, which builds up into the
Collective Psychology's body. In general, this production of the repression
of knowledge is the Artificial Intelligence, whose description I was completing
at Lutece - as follow:
Artificial
Intelligence can be described or defined as
Industry of Code. We can understand
its meaning by comparison with an Industry of
the Letter that we know and that we are able to analyse. The
industry of the Letter builds up the ability to lie, the conception
of time, and consequently borders reality and truth. The
Code is in charge of another dimension, as it manifests for instance through
relativity. Regarding relative forms for example, the Code is known
as resulting in DNA composition. It appears also in societies, for example
through Civil Code which identifies the relative forms of nations or
cultures.
Economically,
the industry of Code is responsible for computer sciences, as well as sciences
of politics, genetics etc... and always manifests, as through various techniques
: robotics, genetic engineering, mass media etc... These techniques build
up a new regime which enters in action once the industry of the Letter has
completed its operation of civilization. With a reality of space and time
and a memory of archives, the Letter's fruit may be ripe for the consomption
of the Code.
This
is why I could explain in Lutece my implication in the development
of Genetics.
As
we know, Cybek promotes the popularization of individul
DNA preservation. This is part of the indutry of Code. As the Resistance.is
principally what emerges of it at the present time
, it is a moment for expanding the analysis
- that is, in my position, to observe the other blind spot points from which
one can approach the Collective Psychology's repression.
As
for an investigation of a Purloined Letter
in our present society,
wearing the dark glasses of anomia made it easy to look at an obvious
place within the field of genetics and reproduction, comparable with a central
shelf from which all documents have already been swiped by the police, allegedly
for further forensic examination. On this devastated area, once hosting essays
about Freedom for Cloning Oneself, and other books about Mass-Genetics of
Consciousness, a broken vase is all that remains for Psychoanalytic
investigation.
Amongst
this ruin of dust, this unusually damaged labware is what calls for
identification.
In
search of what is repressed, the method of Psychoanalysis is looking at was
is not said, abandoned, neglected. Actually, what it seeks has often
been said, at least once, and then effectively repressed. In
this case, what I called above broken vase is the unoperated
experiment on In Vitro Gestation. Such breeding technique of embryos and
fetuses in hardware, incubators and aparatus placentas, until they are ready
to be born, has been mentioned by at least one famous author. Artificial
Gestation is described in Huxley's Brave New World ; and yet, In Vitro
Gestation is no more reflected anywhere. There are NO tubes, nor labs
around the world which experiment with artificial pregnancy.
Related
information remains unformulated as well - except for a few Science Fiction
novels ; no mention is made of any desire - or its opposite - of mankind
for such a possibility, nor consideration for possible beneficial changes
it may cause in an ecosystem currently endangered by its own natural
intelligence.
Since
mankind experiments in many various fields, it is hard to find one that is
not touched except for this obvious blind spot. Of course, In
Vitro Gestation may be studied in rare secret labs - yet
precisely this is reinforcing the notation of a special repression. I don't
want to advocate Freedom
, Science and Knowledge ; politicians do not like
when unauthorized person do their job. I just notice this broken illusion
and, simply as I operated my investigation on Akhnaton, I could get enough
in gathering basic information for completing the bases of a Psychoanalysis.
Nothing more than a few books and reports were enough for meeting with competent
Egyptologists - and to observe their behavior. Today; the resulting
interpretation is consistant for any honest observor. In the case of In Vitro
Gestation, my basic knowledge in medicine allowed me to interview specialists
who all confirmed that there must not be any objective obstacle against a
possibility for In Vitro Gestation experiment.
If
there is no known impossibility, whether an instrumental
method for fetuse growth is possible, can only be said though
experimentation
.
An
interesting observation could be made with every interview. After their answers,
regularly I received a question in return : what would be the reason for
such study ?
There
again, I do not want to encroach on anyone's field. Whether Economists, or
Biologists, or Psychologists etc... each one of them would find within one
day's consideration, hundred good reasons for interest in In Vitro
Gestation. The innocent aspect of the question that was returned to me,
was sufficient to indicate the deep action of the repression amongst the
scientists with whom I was speaking.
In
my Discourse at Lutece, I was explaining to my folks how and why my
career embarked ultimately upon reaching the investigation of the status
of In Vitro Gestation. This is also what I do and announce in this NewsLetter.
Since Lutece however, a new member of my family asked me another question
instead of the usual what for? He asked : why do you? I answered
that looking at what is irrationally unsaid was part of my expertise, if
not my duty. He could then give me his opinion about the unexploration of
the field of In Vitro Gestation. He thinks that there would be numbers
of people who would be furious if they knew that such experiments were held
anywhere on this planet.
It
is not hard to imagine, but it was good to hear it said.
The next update page will be on Moses - and the meaning of anger, according to the esoteric description of Moses' operation. It will be then possible to update a further page about Resistance.
Dr. William THEAUX, NYC 98/09/02 11:52:01 (actually uploaded 98/09/18, slowly catching up against inhibition)
NOTE 20 : E.Drukheim was the founder of Sociology in Paris in 1900. Beside the Association (A) as for representing the object of his science, the anomia (a) is the core definition of the individual. As it fundamentaly refers to suicide, anomia can however be dedramatized when related to the solving depression that ends the Narcissic phase of Human Psychology . This subjective henge marks the admissibility beyond the Pleasure Principle <back to text>
NOTE of the NOTE : 'henge' as for hinge or hedge is an appropriate term for the use of Lacanian topology <back to note>
NOTE 30 : Practicaly the experiment with the marketing of DNA kits is enlightening. Many people have visited the pages and there has not been a single order nor any question or feed-back. As there practically no other easy tool for conservation of one's DNA, it means that amongs hundred of visitors, none has been looking for taking this sane and caring measure. When Genetics will become as commun as banking our money, this situation will nearly be unbelievable. Yet, it is possible to study its mechanism - a page (an update still in preparation today) will describe thi structure.<back to text>
NOTE 35 : Part of this Newsletter as been cut by the censorship of an editor. This part will nevertheless be available in a location (still in preparation today) <back to text>
NOTE 40 : The obstacle Psychoanalysis
discloses in regards to the material possibility of the most repressed future
probability, is similar to the one its discloses in regards to memory with
Akhnaton's probable Primal Scene casuistic. While there is no impossibility
for the Triplex identification of Akhnaton, the Academia of our Grave Old
World would not attempt any consultations that would clearly gather the
affirmation of its possibility. <back to
text>
© CYBEK of New York, 1999.