Author : Zenon Kelper
The text/pictures on the black background below ( in the full version) present the first edition of the page. It is an attempt to clarify and break through the inhibition of failure that Freud then Lacan encountered when they engaged in the description of the Superego.
It is also possible the use the Four Discourses formula, where this 'black box' area is allocated to the place for the product. After Freud (the product is the murdered father) and Lacan (the product is the Oedipian family), PLAN allows theorizing that a living human body can be there (as we say that a professor, a president is a human product of the society). This is possible with Durkheim's sociology which integrates the professions, social roles and functions as the significands of the social fabric. The voices of the professor, the president etc... are therefore superegotic, unavoidably they are severed from the reality.
that his discovery could be applied to the production of the society
- Lacan also suggested that transference could be used in order to disclose
the irrealism of the professional delivery of truth.
They both failed and the academia is still
unable to evaluate the real origin of the Oedipus
Complex in front of the population.
also predicts this failure, as long as a
human is living in the product place, he will compromise with the
counter-transference of his pair.
theorized a complex in a 3 dimensional set (aiming to
an 'n+1' dimension). Thenafter, still
before the realization of Cybernetics, Lacan showed on the scale of
Human Desire (a), the manifested AGENT
as SuperEgo. This is the formula of the
a-subjective materialistic tyranny.
comment : ...this schema is very similar to the position of Transference (which bridges Society and Nature) ; however this Clause of Knowledge set the superego (instead of the Code of Democracy) - this de-idealisation of the Absolute happens when S1 (expertise, Master Significand) is held by a human figure (imago) - in other words, when the system products an 'expert', leader, artificially (see the formation of a Furher) instead of Artificial Intelligence (Expert System).
Here is a second explaination of the schema (sus) of this superego's setting - where the Republic suffers because of the Resistance of Psychoanalysis:
Four Discourses (Lacan) applied in Freud's diagram - comment : At this place (AGENT) the disorder is mate with/to ALTER - it tends towards the Crossed out ("/S/") representation of the expertise ("S1").
The "+1" dimension is seen on the full version of Freud's schema (which shows Lacan's limitation in the three dimensional - borromean - complex; above). The following graph shows the 'green' opening to the Environmental space/concept (sparing all 'super' renforcement of the ego) which supports an Ideal-nature reconnection.
comment : ...In Freud's Model, a connexion with the Environment (x) shows an opportnity to escape the super-egotisation cycle - there Transference is shown allowing Nature & Ideal to mate. This (Ideal, Environment, x, exterior) new circuit becomes Ecology when the correspondent Expertise is Cybernetical.
END OF THE PAGE
EXCHANGE IDEAS, IMPROVE KNOWLEDGE
Registration to a
time $15 fee
All transactions are secured
© William Theaux 1949-1999